Drawing for SIYPRO

USPTO serial 79010647

SIYPRO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINGLE, JAMES W
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIYPRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical products for the petrochemical industrySECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 1, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 14, 2020CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 5, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Apr 23, 2009ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 19, 2008ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 12, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 16, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 12, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 25, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 25, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 6, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 6, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 17, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 9, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 26, 2005IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB—
Aug 19, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 17, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 10, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 9, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance