Drawing for EKA

USPTO serial 79010662

EKA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3256532Status 707Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 26, 2007
Examiner
KON, ELISSA GARBER
Law office
—

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with EKA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Deborah Henscheid

Deborah Henscheid Lorenz & Kopf, LLP7010 E. Cochise Rd.Scottsdale, AZ 85253UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007[ Machines for the production of chemicals for industrial use ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
009[ Apparatus, namely, processing analyzers in the nature of gas, liquid, liquid suspension and solid substance analyzers for the monitoring and control of processing and manufacturing plants; instruments for measuring compositional, physical, chemical, electrochemical, electrical and optical properties of gasses, liquids, liquid suspensions and solid substances; computer or microprocessor control systems containing computer hardware and software sold as a unit for monitoring or controlling manufacturing processes; all of the foregoing for use in the production of chemicals, the control of processing and manufacturing plants, the monitoring or control of paper making machines, the monitoring or control of pulp and paper manufacturing or pulp bleaching processes ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Design and engineering of equipment and plants for the manufacturing of chemicals; providing of monitoring services for the operation of processing and manufacturing plants and equipment; providing of advice on improving of pulp bleaching [ and paper making ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 26, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 27, 2024ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 14, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 30, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 23, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2018LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Dec 14, 2018RHRDRESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED—
May 4, 2018INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 9, 2018XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 9, 2018XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Feb 28, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 29, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 29, 201771.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 26, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Dec 12, 2014CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 11, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 20, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 2, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 29, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 24, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jul 24, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 9, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 9, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 6, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 26, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 10, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 21, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 26, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 21, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 16, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 16, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 16, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 24, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 9, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 9, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 4, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jul 29, 2006UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 18, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 18, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 11, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 3, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 3, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 3, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 2, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 21, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 1, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 22, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 10, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 9, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance