USPTO serial 79010684
STORM-IN-A-D-CUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3158931Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 17, 2006
- Examiner
- HOLTZ, ALLISON
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STORM-IN-A-D-CUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan M. Freedman
SUSAN M FREEDMAN NIXON PEABODY LLP401 9TH ST NW STE 900WASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Swimwear, lingerie, beachwear, shoes, hats | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 26, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 13, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 18, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 18, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 25, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 5, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 19, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 27, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 27, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 24, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 25, 2005 | IRRH | IRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | IRRF | IRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |