CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for GREENLAND

USPTO serial 79010717

GREENLAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 602
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAIN, CATHERINE P
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with GREENLAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Soaps for personal use; perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 25, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 15, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2021CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 4, 2021CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 30, 2019CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 26, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 3, 2016CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 20, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Apr 30, 2013CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 29, 2013CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 10, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 7, 2008ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 19, 2007ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 24, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 28, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 28, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 26, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 26, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 21, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 30, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 18, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 17, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 10, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 9, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance