USPTO serial 79010775
ITEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3398620Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 18, 2008
- Examiner
- COWARD, JEFFERY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ITEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ten Cate Advanced Textiles B.V.
Nijverdal, NL
Ten Cate Advanced Textiles B.V.
Nijverdal, NL
Ten Cate Advanced Textiles B.V.
Nijverdal, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary Catherine Merz
Mary Catherine Merz Merz & Associates, P.C.1140 Lake StreetSuite 304Oak Park, IL 60301Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | protective clothing, namely, clothing for protection against accidents, irradiation, fire and bacteria | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | surgical scrub suits; medical shoes for use during surgery; medical examination suits and gowns, shirts, pants, tunics, and jackets for use during patient examination | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 022 | string, textile fibers, commercial nets, sacks or bags for the transportation or storage of materials in bulk; padding and stuffing materials not of rubber or plastic; raw fibrous textile materials | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 024 | textile fabrics for home and commercial interiors; textile fabrics for the manufacture of clothing, shoes, protective clothing, safety gloves, medical clothing and headgear, namely, caps and hats; labels of textile; towels of textile and bath linen; textile fabrics for the manufacture of bed and table covers, namely, bed spreads, duvets and table cloths not of paper; textile fabrics for the manufacture of medicated blankets, duvets and sheets; textile cloths for use in manufacturing in the automotive, aircraft and spacecraft industries; textile linings for strengthening garments, shoes, hats, helmets, blinds, awnings, parasols, and for strengthening applications in the automotive, aircraft and spacecraft industries; textile cloth for the use in the manufacture of blinds, awnings, parasols, tents, commercial nets, and sacks and bags for the transportation or storage of materials in bulk | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | clothing, namely, shirts, blouses, tops, gloves, mittens, shawls, scarves, ties, knotted ties, sweaters, pants, shorts, skirts, dresses, suits, coats, jackets, underwear, socks, stockings; headgear, namely, caps and hats; outer materials for shoes, namely, shoe uppers, internal and external shoe soles and front and rear sole ends | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ten Cate Advanced Textiles B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Ten Cate Advanced Textiles B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Ten Cate Advanced Textiles B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 022
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named ITEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 24, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 24, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 17, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 1, 2010 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 11, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 17, 2007 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 17, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 1, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2007 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 11, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 16, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 8, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 31, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 31, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 31, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 21, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |