Drawing for BALAN

USPTO serial 79010819

BALAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRODY, DANIEL S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BALAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed matter, photographsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
025Clothing, footwear, headgearSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
041Entertainment; sporting and cultural activitiesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 28, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 27, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 17, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 10, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 10, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 30, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 16, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 16, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 7, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 7, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 31, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 12, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 9, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 17, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance