Drawing for RENAISSANCE

USPTO serial 79010823

RENAISSANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DWYER, SEAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RENAISSANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joyce W. Jenzano

JOYCE W JENZANO MOORE & VAN ALLEN PLLC430 DAVIS DR STE 500MORRISVILLE, NC 27560UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Pralines; chocolate candiesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 13, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 13, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 21, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 5, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 5, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 31, 2006LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 17, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Feb 17, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 17, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 29, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 29, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 19, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 6, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 5, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 27, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 27, 2005CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 21, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 30, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 18, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 17, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance