Drawing for ADAR PUSH

USPTO serial 79010845

ADAR PUSH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3187513Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 19, 2006
Examiner
KON, ELISSA GARBER
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ADAR PUSH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Maria A. Scungio

Maria A. Scungio Edwards Wildman Palmer LLPF.D.R. Station; P.O. Box 130NEW YORK, NY 10150UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020[ PLASTIC HINGES; ] NON-METAL LOCKS; NON-METALLIC FITTINGS AND PARTS FOR FURNITURE, [ DOORS, BUILDINGS AND ] FURNISHINGS IN THE NATURE OF NON-METAL KNOBS, SCREWS, [ NUTS, ] PLATES, BARS, [ ESCUTCHEONS, DOOR, WINDOW AND ] DRAWER TRIM, PULLS, [ HANDLES, ] CATCHES, LATCHES, [ HOOKS, EYES, ] STOPS, SLIDES [ AND HANDLES ]SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 10, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 10, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 1, 2014INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 1, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 9, 2013INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 23, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 9, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
Aug 9, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Aug 9, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 27, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 19, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 19, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 10, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 19, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 30, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 16, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 16, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 3, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 13, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 15, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 14, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 13, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 13, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 21, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 20, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 19, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 27, 2005LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Jun 17, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance