Drawing for CAPMAT

USPTO serial 79010858

CAPMAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3194330Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 2, 2007
Examiner
CHOE,KELLY
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with CAPMAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JENNIFER A. VAN KIRK

JENNIFER A. VAN KIRK Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP201 East Washington Street, Suite 1200PHOENIX, AZ 85004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines for manufacturing packing materials, namely, plastic bagsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 2, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 2, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 2, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 1, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 28, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Dec 4, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Dec 4, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 17, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Oct 17, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 11, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 3, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 3, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 1, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 2, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 30, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 16, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 16, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 17, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 27, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 30, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 28, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 3, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 20, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 11, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 22, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 21, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 3, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 24, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 24, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 20, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 20, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 19, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 17, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance