Drawing for CASA MODA'S

USPTO serial 79010892

CASA MODA'S

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SCHRODY, ALLISON PAIGE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CASA MODA'S?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Otto O. Lee

OTTO O LEE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP LLP12 S 1ST ST 12TH FLSAN JOSE, CA 95113UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024Bedclothes, namely, bed sheets, pillow shams; eiderdowns, bed blankets; tablecloths; covers for sofas, namely, unfitted fabric furniture covers; bedspreads; towels made of textiles or synthetic fabrics; tapestry, namely, tapestries of textile; wall hangings of textileSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 11, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 13, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 25, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 12, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 12, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 12, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 12, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 16, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 9, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 9, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 23, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 1, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 30, 2006NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 16, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 13, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 12, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 5, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 13, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 13, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 1, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 22, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 17, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance