Drawing for IBOSS

USPTO serial 79010901

IBOSS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3247682Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 29, 2007
Examiner
LAMOTHE, LESLEY
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IBOSS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JENNIFER FRASER

JENNIFER FRASER CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ LLPPO BOX 2207WILMINGTON, DE 19899UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computers; data processing apparatus, namely, data processors; recorded computer programmes (programs) for use in database management, for use as a spreadsheet, for word processing, for use in system operating; recorded computer operating programs; recorded computer software for use in database management, for use as a spreadsheet, for word processing, for use in system operating; information processing engines and central processing devices, namely, computer hardware and central processing units; transmitters of electronic signals; optical communication equipment, namely, synchronous digital hierarchy (SDH) optical transport systems, namely, terminal multiplexers, add/drop multiplexers, regenerators and computer programs for managing optical networks; network communication equipment, namely computer routers, modems, Digital Subscriber Line Access Multiplexers, wires for use in network communication, communications servers, telecommunication switches for use in network communication, set-top boxes and homegateway; program control phone exchange systems, namely, stored program controlled telephone switches consisting of switching network module, operation and maintenance module, remote switching module, packet handling module, remote subscriber unit, peripheral switching module and computer programs for telecommunication switches and voice mail and message and computer programs to manage, operate and maintain telecommunication systems and telecommunication networks, subscriber line board and trunk line boardSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 2, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 2, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 11, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 17, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 17, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Sep 3, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 3, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Aug 14, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 31, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 31, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 22, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 29, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 13, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 21, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 30, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 29, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 6, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 5, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 5, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 4, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 16, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 16, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 2, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 1, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 20, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 20, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 12, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 11, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 27, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 11, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 27, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 26, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2005RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Oct 6, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 27, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 17, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance