USPTO serial 79010935
UM PEGOMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TANNER, MICHAEL R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UM PEGOMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DONALD N. HUFF
DONALD N HUFF DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC1300 I ST NW3RD FL WWASHINGTON, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | GRINDING MACHINES, POWER SAW BLADES, MACHINES AND APPARATUS FOR CLEANING MACHINE TOOLS, KNIFE SHARPENING MACHINES, KNIFE PLANNING MACHINES, SCREW CUTTING MACHINES;, MILLING MACHINES, BORING MACHINES, DEGREASING MACHINES | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 008 | CUTTING HAND TOOLS NAMELY BORDERS, SCISSORS, KNIVES,MILLING CUTTERS, DIES, DRILL HOLDERS, BITS, PLANES, MOULDING IRONS, DIGGERS, PICKAXES, CHISELS, AXES, PINCERS, GRINDING TOOLS AND INSTRUMENTS; GRINDING STONES; BLADES FOR HAND TOOLS i | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | POLISHING, GRINDING OFF, INFORMATION ABOUT TREATMENT OF METAL, METAL TREATING, METAL TEMPERING, FULLERING WITH LASER BEAM, GRINDING, FORGE ACTIVITIES | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 21, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |