USPTO serial 79010940
X-HI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 7, 2007
- Examiner
- FISHER, LATONIA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with X-HI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
VAI CLECIM (société par actions simplifiée)
FR
Other trademarks owned by VAI CLECIM (société par actions simplifiée)
VAI CLECIM (société par actions simplifiée)
FR
Other trademarks owned by VAI CLECIM (société par actions simplifiée)
VAI CLECIM (société par actions simplifiée)
FR
Other trademarks owned by VAI CLECIM (société par actions simplifiée)
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Vincent L. Ramik
Vincent L. Ramik Miles & Stockbridge P.C.1751 Pinnacle DriveSuite 500McLean, VA 22102-3833Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Common metals and their alloys, namely, aluminum and its alloys, ferrous and non-ferrous metals, namely, carbon steel, mild alloy steel, stainless steel, multiphase steel, tool steel, namely, high speed steel, aluminum, namely, pure aluminum, work hardening alloys, namely, aluminum alloys, magnesium alloys, heat treatable alloys, namely, aluminum and copper alloys, thin metal bands, thin metal sheets, namely, bands and sheets for general use and for use in the manufacture of automotive parts, namely, car body sides, car floor pans, car fenders, car roofs, car hoods, car doors, and car trunk lids, welded metal tubes, household electrical appliances, namely, face plates for washing machines, ovens, metal wires, namely, wire fencing, cable wire, metal time capsules, metal sealing covers, namely, caps for plastics or glass bottles, pots and cans; metal sealing covers, namely, caps for food tin boxes and metal cans, metal foils for household use, flexible metal wrappers, namely, aluminum wrapping foil paper, steel strapping bands, steel strips, namely, sheets, metal sheets, namely, steel sheets for general use, pressure vessels, fabricated parts of machines, shipbuilding, common metal alloy foils and strips, namely, aluminum alloys for general use and aircraft construction, unwrought or semi-wrought iron for electromagnetic devices, tin food boxes and cans sold empty, foils of metal for wrapping and packaging, namely, aluminum paper and aluminum thin sheets, unwrought or semi-wrought steel, alloys of common metal, namely, aluminum alloys, for general use and welded parts, and building construction materials of metal, namely, columns and braces for welded structures | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 007 | ROLLING MILLS, ROLLING MILL CYLINDERS, CONVEYOR LINES FOR MANUFACTURING METAL SHEETS AND STRIPS, METAL WORKING MACHINES, NAMELY, MACHINE CENTERS AND MACHINE TOOLS, NAMELY, MACHINES AND PRODUCTION LINES FOR MANUFACTURING THIN ALUMINUM STRIPS AND FOILS, POWER OPERATED SHEARS FOR CUTTING TO LENGTH METAL BANDS, LEVELERS FOR STRAIGHTENING METAL BANDS, AND MACHINE TOOLS FOR CUTTING, WARPING AND SHAPING METALS | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VAI CLECIM (société par actions simplifiée)
- Other trademarks owned by VAI CLECIM (société par actions simplifiée)
- Other trademarks owned by VAI CLECIM (société par actions simplifiée)
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named X-HI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 21, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 14, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 14, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 2, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 22, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 2, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 25, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 3, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |