Drawing for BAGS

USPTO serial 79010993

BAGS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3183963Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 12, 2006
Examiner
WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BAGS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Jewelry, namely, rings, bracelets, earrings, charms, chains, necklaces and ornamental pinsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 7, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 6, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 6, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 6, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 28, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 17, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 17, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
May 20, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 20, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 31, 2012CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 29, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 18, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 16, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 13, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 13, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 10, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 12, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 1, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 16, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 16, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 26, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 6, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 4, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 25, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 19, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 17, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 16, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 12, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 12, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 12, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 12, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 15, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 2, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 19, 2005IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB—
Aug 16, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 13, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 12, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 17, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance