USPTO serial 79011020
NEVADENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3171669Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 14, 2006
- Examiner
- ALLEN, SUSAN EILEEN BI
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEVADENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maria C. H. Lin
MARIA C H LIN MORGAN & FINNEGAN LLP3 WORLD FINANCIAL CTRNEW YORK, NY 10281-1013UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Dental floss | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| May 20, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 29, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 9, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 13, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 23, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |