Drawing for LAMBDA

USPTO serial 79011037

LAMBDA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3204136Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 30, 2007
Examiner
LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with LAMBDA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Colleen Flynn Goss

Colleen Flynn Goss Fay Sharpe LLP1228 Euclid AvenueThe Halle Building, 5th FloorCleveland, OH 44115

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Fruit juicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 30, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 19, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 8, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 8, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 4, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 30, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 30, 2012NA15SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED—
May 30, 201215AKREGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED—
May 30, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 30, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 1, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2012E15RTEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2007FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 24, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 24, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 21, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 3, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 30, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 1, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 16, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 16, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 14, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 25, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 22, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 20, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 1, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 14, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 14, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 14, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 9, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 3, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 10, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 27, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 27, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 26, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 17, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance