CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for UMBERTO

USPTO serial 79011062

UMBERTO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3187515Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 19, 2006
Examiner
SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with UMBERTO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*

Plus Government fees of $1,300

Trademark Monitoring(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gregory M. York, Ph.D.

Gregory M. York, Ph.D. EVENTIDE LAW LLC55 Public Square, Suite 2100CLEVELAND, OH 44113United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer programs stored on data media for modeling, calculating, visualizing and analyzing materials, chemicals, material flow systems, energy flow systems and industrial and environmental processesACTIVE—
042[ Scientific research; research in the field of industrial and environmental process modeling and analysis; ] consultation in the field of scientific research and industrial and environmental process modeling and analysis; analysis of industrial and environmental processes for industrial manufacturing plants and of material and energy flow systems; [ rendering technical expert opinions on industrial and environmental processes for industrial manufacturing plants; ] programming of data processing equipmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 15, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jul 13, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 27, 2026ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 31, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2025ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Feb 26, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 2, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2018INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 27, 2018XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 26, 2018XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jan 9, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 9, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 9, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 8, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 9, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 23, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Apr 9, 2015CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 12, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 26, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Dec 26, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Dec 26, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 4, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Dec 4, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 19, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 19, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 10, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 19, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 30, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 16, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 16, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 3, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 13, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 17, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 11, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 4, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 4, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 16, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 15, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 10, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 6, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 6, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 9, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 22, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 22, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 17, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2005SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance