Drawing for HICON

USPTO serial 79011076

HICON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3202266Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 23, 2007
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HICON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Air conditioners for vehicles; extractor hoods for kitchens; air dampers for use in regulating air conditioning systems; air conditioning apparatus; central air conditioning installations; air filtering installations, namely, air filters for air conditioning units; air reheaters, namely, electric space heaters; air cooling apparatus, namely, air conditioning units and window-mounting air conditioners; ventilation installations and apparatus for air conditioning, namely, ventilating exhaust fans; drinking water dispensers, namely, water fountains and refrigerated dispensing units for drinking waterSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 7, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 16, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Oct 2, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 17, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 26, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 2, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 22, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 21, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 17, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 23, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 30, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 16, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 16, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 7, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 18, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 18, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 8, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 29, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 2, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 28, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 28, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 1, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 18, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 3, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 3, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 2, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 17, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2005SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance