Drawing for NOKAST URBAN WEAR FOR FREE PEOPLE

USPTO serial 79011132

NOKAST URBAN WEAR FOR FREE PEOPLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHISOLM, KEVON
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NOKAST URBAN WEAR FOR FREE PEOPLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Leather and imitation leather sold in bulk, trunks and suitcases, handbags, backpacks, wheeled bags, bags for climbers, bags for campers, traveling bags, beach bags, school bagsABANDONED—
025Clothing, namely, jacket, vest, parkas, sweaters, tee shirts, shirts, trousers, footwear and headgear, namely, caps and hoodsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 29, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 28, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 5, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 29, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 27, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 27, 2007MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 27, 2007ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Nov 19, 2007OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Aug 17, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 16, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 27, 2007OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 26, 2007OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Jul 26, 2007OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Jun 27, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 29, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 9, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 7, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 23, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 23, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 8, 2005CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 4, 2005IRRHIRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU—
Nov 1, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 28, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 25, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 11, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 9, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 9, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 9, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 9, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 22, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 6, 2005IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB—
Aug 30, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 29, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 24, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 23, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance