Drawing for ORTHOLINC

USPTO serial 79011136

ORTHOLINC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3130037Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 15, 2006
Examiner
LOWRY, LEIGH A
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORTHOLINC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stewart J. Bellus

STEWART J BELLUS COLLARD & ROE PC1077 NORTHERN BLVDROSLYN, NY 11576UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Pre-recorded data carriers containing images and sound, namely, CDs, CD-ROMs, magnetic tapes, records, cassette tapes, hard disks, floppy disks, mini-disks, DVDs, USB-sticks, MP3 files, read-only MP3 players, and memory cards featuring information on medicine and pharmacySECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
016Printed matter, namely, books, magazines and instructional and teaching material in the fields of medicine and pharmacySECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
041Educational services, namely, organization of and conducting seminars, tutorials, conferences, congresses and offering correspondence courses in the fields of medicine and pharmacy; teaching in the fields of medicine and pharmacy; providing training and further education, namely, providing continuing medical education courses; organization of exhibitions for cultural, educational and teaching purposes in the fields of medicine and pharmacy; production of motion picture films, radio programs, television programs and internet radio and television programs; and publication of texts, except advertising textsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
044Medical and pharmaceutical consultationSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 4, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 4, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 8, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 18, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 18, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
May 20, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 20, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 18, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 12, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 12, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 10, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 15, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 23, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 3, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 3, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 31, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 27, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 25, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 24, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 8, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 3, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 3, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 2, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 1, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 12, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 5, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 5, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 5, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 5, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 7, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 30, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 24, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 23, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance