Drawing for PHEASANT PLUCKER

USPTO serial 79011158

PHEASANT PLUCKER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PHEASANT PLUCKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Bags, holdalls, travel bags, rucksacksSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
025Footwear, clothing and headgearSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 29, 2016UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
Nov 21, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Nov 20, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Aug 10, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 6, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 6, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 21, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 7, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 23, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Nov 23, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 29, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 29, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 19, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 28, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Nov 24, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Nov 23, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 22, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 24, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Jun 23, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance