USPTO serial 79011162
AUSASTEEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 20, 2010
- Examiner
- LOWRY, LEIGH A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AUSASTEEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
E-01015 VITORIA (Álava), ES
E-01015 VITORIA (Álava), ES
E-01015 VITORIA (Álava), ES
E-01015 VITORIA (Álava), ES
E-01015 VITORIA (Álava), ES
E-01015 VITORIA (Álava), ES
ES
ES
ES
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arturo Perez-Guerrero
ARTURO PEREZ-GUERRERO LAW OFFICES OF ARTURO PEREZ-GUERREROP.O.BOX 9024163SAN JUAN, PR 00902-4163UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Unwrought and semi-wrought base metals and steel, brass, copper, aluminum and their alloys in the form of bars, rolls, coils, ingots and pieces for further manufacture; rolled and cast metal construction materials, namely, metal molds for forming cement products; metal springs; metallic rails for railway tracks and steel, brass, copper and aluminum for railway tracks, except for driving chains for vehicles; metallic tubes, large and transportable metal safes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Advertising agencies; retail store services in small shops and via global computer networks featuring common metals and their alloys, metal building materials, transportable metal constructions, materials of metal for railway tracks, non-electric cables and wires of common metal, metal pipes and tubes, safes, minerals | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 039 | Transportation and delivery of goods and packages by ground vehicle, rail, air, and boat; packaging for transportation and storage services for common metals and their alloys, metal building materials, transportable metal constructions, materials of metal for railway tracks, non-electric cables and wires of common metal, ironmongery and small items of metal hardware, metal pipes and tubes, safes, goods of common metal, minerals | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Treatment of materials, namely, metal treatment | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Industrial analysis and evaluation services all in the field of metals, namely, unwrought and semi-wrought base metals and steel, brass, copper, aluminum and their alloys; development of computer hardware and software for others; legal services | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LEYRE TERESA UGARTE ANDA
- Other trademarks owned by LEYRE TERESA UGARTE ANDA
- Other trademarks owned by LEYRE TERESA UGARTE ANDA
- Other trademarks owned by LEANDRO JESUS UGARTE ANDA
- Other trademarks owned by LEANDRO JESUS UGARTE ANDA
- Other trademarks owned by LEANDRO JESUS UGARTE ANDA
- Other trademarks owned by MARIA DEL ORO UGARTE ANDA
- Other trademarks owned by MARIA DEL ORO UGARTE ANDA
- Other trademarks owned by MARIA DEL ORO UGARTE ANDA
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named AUSASTEEL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 24, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 4, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 20, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 22, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 22, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 4, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 25, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 25, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 31, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 30, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 29, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 30, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 25, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 25, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 25, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |