Drawing for GLOOR

USPTO serial 79011223

GLOOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAST, PAUL
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GLOOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Autogenous welding and cutting equipment, namely, autogenous cuffing and welding torches, blow torches, namely oxygen operated cuffing torches; pressure regulating valves for high-pressure gases, namely, oxygen, acetylene, CO2 and similar gases; high-pressure acetylene generatorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 20, 2007DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 22, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 6, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 6, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 7, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 23, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 23, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 31, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 31, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 30, 2005RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Nov 30, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 30, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 15, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 27, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 26, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 13, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 22, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 21, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 20, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 24, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 23, 2005SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance