Drawing for FEROX

USPTO serial 79011251

FEROX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3228010Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 10, 2007
Examiner
SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FEROX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jay Begler

Jay Begler Nixon Peabody LLP401 Ninth Street, N.W.Suite 900Washington, DC 20004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Creams, pomades, gels and lotions for cosmetic use; non-medicated cosmetic skin care preparations, essential oils, cleansing milks, make-up remover; oils for cosmetic use, cosmetic sun-tanning preparations, cosmetic preparations for protecting the skin from the effects of the sun, bath salts not for medical use, deodorants for personal use, deodorant soaps, soaps, shampoos, hair lotions, perfumes, eau de toilette, make-up products for the face and bodySECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 16, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 27, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 22, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 22, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jul 15, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 15, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 26, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 2, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 27, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 19, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 10, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 23, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 3, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 14, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 2, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 2, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 1, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 30, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 30, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 13, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 31, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 30, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 30, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 28, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 28, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 9, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 23, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 23, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 27, 2006NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 20, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 23, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 2, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 1, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 30, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 1, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance