USPTO serial 79011285
BONNELLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3251895Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 12, 2007
- Examiner
- KEAM, ALEX S
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BONNELLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
FR
F-25000 BESANCON, FR
F-25000 BESANCON, FR
F-25000 BESANCON, FR
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Bath linen except clothing; cotton fabrics; jersey fabric; hand-towels made of textile fabrics; face towels of textile; washing mitts; elastic fabrics for clothing | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Caps and turbans of paper or paper-based, disposable or not, for use in the bath or shower; headgear, namely, turbans and boudoir caps as accessories for holding hair, made of plastic and textile materials, and fabric substitutes for protecting and facilitating the drying of hair, and for use in the bath or shower | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 026 | Turbans and boudoir caps as accessories for holding hair, for protecting and facilitating the drying of hair | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BALKAN Mumin
- Other trademarks owned by Piron Didier
- Other trademarks owned by Piron Didier
- Other trademarks owned by Piron Didier
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Similar marks named BONNELLE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2015 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 17, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 5, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 30, 2007 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 28, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 28, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 11, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 4, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |