USPTO serial 79011348
ZINCFANT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3120958Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 25, 2006
- Examiner
- HIRSCHMAN, PAMELA
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with ZINCFANT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary Catherine Merz
Mary Catherine Merz Merz & Associates, P.C.408 Madison St, Suite AOak Park, IL 60302United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical preparations containing zinc for medical use, particularly in the treatment of acute diarrhea of infants and young children and in the treatment of the micronutrients deficiencies diseases; [ dietetic foods containing zinc adapted for medical use, particularly in the treatment of the micronutrients deficiencies diseases; ] sanitary preparations containing zinc for treatment of the micronutrients deficiencies diseases; ] medicinal preparations containing zinc for the mouth to be applied in the form of drops, capsules, tablets, compressed and dispersible tablets, liquids, sachets [ ; food for babies; medical plasters, dressings for wounds, burns, surgery ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2026 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2026 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 27, 2026 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2025 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 5, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2019 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Jan 15, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 3, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2017 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jan 11, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 27, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2015 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | 15AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 2, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 12, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 19, 2005 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2005 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |