Drawing for YAYO

USPTO serial 79011349

YAYO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3117367Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 18, 2006
Examiner
CHISOLM, KEVON
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with YAYO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Dressings for salads, coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; flour and preparations made from cereals, namely, pasta and noodles, ready-to-serve-meals made primarily of noodles; bread, pastry and confectionery, edible ices; honey, treacle; yeast, baking powder; salt; mustard; condiments, namely, vinegar, sauces and spicesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
032Beers; mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic drinks, namely, fruit drinks and fruit juices; syrups and other preparations for making beverages, namely, fruit drinks and fruit juicesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
033Alcoholic beverages except beers, namely, wine, sparkling wine, rum, gin, vodka, sake, port wines, aperitifs, cognac, whiskey, and tequila; Chinese brewed liquor, namely, laojiou; Chinese mixed liquor, namely, wujiapie-jiou; Chinese white liquor, namely, baiganr; extracts of spiritous liquors, Japanese regenerated liquors, namely, naoshi; Japanese shochuh-based mixed liquor, namely, mirin; Japanese sweet rice-based mixed liquor, namely, shiro-zake; Japanese white liquor, namely, shochu; Liquor distilled, Tonic liquor containing herb extracts, namely, homeishu; Tonic liquor containing mamushi-snake extracts, namely, mamushi-zake; Tonic liquor flavored with japanese plum extracts, namely, umeshu; Tonic liquor flavored with pine needle extracts, namely, matsuba-zakeSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 24, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 2, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 20, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 20, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
May 20, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 20, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Sep 21, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 18, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 22, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 22, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 19, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 18, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 25, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 5, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 28, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 24, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 17, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 17, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 16, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 15, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 13, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 13, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 13, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 23, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 23, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 23, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 5, 2005IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB—
Oct 3, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 1, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 30, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 1, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance