USPTO serial 79011400
LATEXFALT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3298155Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 25, 2007
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LATEXFALT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
KOUDEKERK A/D RIJN, NL
KOUDEKERK A/D RIJN, NL
KOUDEKERK A/D RIJN, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Glen E. Schumann, Esq.
Glen E. Schumann, Esq. Cozen O'Connor150 South Fifth StreetSuite 1200MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Emulsions not included in other classes, namely, chemical agents used as binders for floors | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | Non-metallic building materials, namely, asphalt, bitumen asphalt and rubber/asphalt emulsions for use as building materials; [ floors not of metal; non-metal floors for buildings; non-metallic building materials namely, rubber flooring, rubber/asphalt flooring for single-piece floors and for rubber/asphalt floors; ] non-metallic building materials, namely, elastomer roof coatings and elastomers for other constructions, namely, elastomerbase driveway sealants | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 6, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 10, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2018 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 30, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 30, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 30, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 8, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2013 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 8, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 25, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 10, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 25, 2006 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 15, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 18, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 2, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |