USPTO serial 79011421
SWEET BEE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3158949Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 17, 2006
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SWEET BEE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
G. FRANKLIN ROTHWELL
G FRANKLIN ROTHWELL ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK PC1425 K ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | COFFEE, TEA, COCOA, RICE, TAPIOCA, SAGO, ARTIFICIAL COFFEE; FLOURS AND PREPARATIONS MADE FROM CEREALS, NAMELY, CEREAL BASED SNACK FOOD, READY TO EAT, CEREAL DERIVED FOOD BARS, BREAD, PASTRY AND CONFECTIONERY, NAMELY, CANDIES, CRYSTAL SUGAR PIECES, FRUIT JELLIES, GUMS, CHEWING GUMS, MINTS, CANDY BARS; YEAST, BAKING SODA, SALT, MUSTARD, VINEGAR, SAUCES, SPICES; ICE FOR REFRESHMENT | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2015 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Nov 16, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 8, 2014 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2014 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2014 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| May 20, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 20, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 20, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 1, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 26, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 6, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |