USPTO serial 79011425
AKTAPURIFIER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3183969Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 12, 2006
- Examiner
- SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AKTAPURIFIER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine Mennenga
Catherine Mennenga General Electric Company3135 Easton TurnpikeCorporate Trademark OperationFairfield, CT 06828-0001Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Liquid chromatography apparatus and chromatography systems comprised of monitors, motor valves, series pumps, fraction collectors, autosampler, a working platform, pre-programmed method templates and analysis software for use with liquid chromatography apparatus and chromatography systems; scientific and laboratory apparatus and chromatography systems for use in purification, consisting of filters, columns, mixing chambers, holders, pumps, cables, tubing kits; and the parts thereof | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB
- Other trademarks owned by GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB (a private limited company)
- Other trademarks owned by AMERSHAM BIOSCIENCES AB
- Other trademarks owned by AMERSHAM BIOSCIENCES AB
- Other trademarks owned by Dr. LUDWIG BRANN PATENTBYRA AB
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named AKTAPURIFIER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jun 13, 2014 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 20, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 17, 2012 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 23, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 16, 2006 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 6, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 11, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 11, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 11, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 10, 2006 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 2, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |