Drawing for LAP POLARIS

USPTO serial 79011438

LAP POLARIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PEREZ, STEVEN M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LAP POLARIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Line lasers for aligning and positioning; laser projectors for showing outlines, shapes or positions on various surfaces; laser Doppler for measuring; laser scanners for measuringSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 9, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 8, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 16, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 26, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 25, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 24, 2007LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 28, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 28, 2006LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 7, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 7, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 23, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 23, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 6, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 6, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 10, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 26, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 22, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 16, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 15, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 8, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 7, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance