USPTO serial 79011449
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John C. Cain
John C. Cain Wong, Cabello, Lutsch, Rutherford & Brucculeri, LL20333 State Highway 249, Suite 600Houston, TX 77070UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Remote control systems comprised of remote controls, transmitters, and receivers for toys, play things, and scale models, namely cars, motorcycles, trucks, tractors, cranes, power shovels, bulldozers, excavators, loaders, forklifts, boats, airplanes, helicopters, rockets, trains, robots, animals, dolls, and construction sets; remote control systems comprised of remote controls, transmitters, and receivers for video games, video machines, televisions, stereos, and radios; remote control systems comprised of remote controls, transmitters, and receivers for full-size machines and apparatus, namely, cranes, lifting apparatus, excavators, loaders, forklifts, robots, and remote operated inspection vehicles; remote control systems comprised of remote controls, transmitters, and receivers for exchange of digital data between computers and computer equipment, namely, keyboards, mice, game pads, printers, and displays; systems for wireless electronic, electric, and digital transmission of signals and data, namely, transmitters and receivers for exchange of data in industrial control networks and home automation networks | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 028 | Toys and play things, namely, cars, motorcycles, trucks, tractors, cranes, power shovels, bulldozers, excavators, loaders, forklifts, boats, airplanes, helicopters, rockets, trains, robots, animals, dolls, and construction sets; and their integral remote control units | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 8, 2014 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2014 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2014 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| May 20, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 22, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 18, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 18, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 28, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 21, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |