Drawing for VIDEO RESEARCH

USPTO serial 79011483

VIDEO RESEARCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VOHRA, SANJEEV KUMAR
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIDEO RESEARCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business management; Assistance, advisory services and consultancy with regard to business planning, business analysis, business management, and business organization; marketing research, namely providing statistical information on commodity sales, marketing research studies, business research, business information and inquiries, providing statistical information, commercial information agencies, management and compilation of computerized databases, public opinion polling, compilation and provision of trade and business price and statistical information, in particular research relating to audience ratings, program ratings, listener ratings and media analysis, company management, including consultancy in demographic matters; business management services, namely, managing logistics, reverse logistics, supply chain services, supply chain visibility and synchronization, supply and demand forecasting and product distribution processes for othersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 13, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 12, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 16, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 26, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 25, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 21, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 7, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 7, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 23, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 23, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 27, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 27, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 9, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 26, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 29, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 29, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 8, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 7, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance