USPTO serial 79011505
PLASTO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3168874Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 7, 2006
- Examiner
- HELLMAN, ELI J
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PLASTO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laura J. Winston, Adda C. Gogoris, Andrew Baum, Robert S. Weisbein, Amy J. Benjamin, Eric Prager, Karin Segall, Randi S. Miller, Heather C. Wilde, Jonathan Matkowsky, Abigail R. Rubinstein and Kathryn Starnella
LAURA J WINSTON, ADDA C GOGORIS, ANDRE DARBY & DARBY PCPO BOX 5257NEW YORK, NY 10150-5257UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Toy vehicles; toy boats; toy airplanes; sand toys; toy bakeware, cookware, kitchen sets, dinner sets, tea sets and coffee sets; ride-on toys; bath toys; infant toys; playground equipment, namely, swings; snow sleds for recreational use; toy snow shovels; swimming aids, namely, arm floats for recreational use; parlor games; toy gliders | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 8, 2014 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2014 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2014 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| May 20, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 22, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 2, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 17, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 17, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |