Drawing for SFEROFLEX

USPTO serial 79011515

SFEROFLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3158953Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 17, 2006
Examiner
KEATING, MICHAEL P
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with SFEROFLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $850

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karen Kreider Gaunt

Karen Kreider Gaunt Dinsmore & Shohl LLP255 East Fifth Street, Suite 1900Cincinnati, OH 45202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009spectacles, [ sunglasses, ] frames for spectacles, frames for spectacles equipped with sprung hingesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 17, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2025ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 21, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2021RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 25, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Dec 28, 2017INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 1, 2017INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 1, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Nov 9, 2017INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 10, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 10, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Mar 9, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 27, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 8, 2014INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 1, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 8, 2013INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 7, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
Aug 8, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Aug 8, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 26, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2011RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 7, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 1, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2007FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 20, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 20, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 9, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 17, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 25, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 5, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 6, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 2, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 23, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 23, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 8, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 8, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 1, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 30, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 8, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 7, 2005SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance