USPTO serial 79011552
TEOSYAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3098382Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 30, 2006
- Examiner
- MAYES, LAURIE ANN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with TEOSYAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard N. Aronson
Howard N. Aronson Lackenbach Siegel LLP1 Chase Rd.Lackenbach Siegel BuildingScarsdale, NY 10583-4156Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical preparations used in dermatology; dermatological pharmaceutical products injected in or under the skin for smoothing wrinkles; dermatological pharaceutical products containing hyaluronic acid for smoothing wrinkles; medical plasters, materials for dressings, namely wound and surgical dressings; material for stopping teeth and dental wax; all purposes disinfectants | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2025 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 31, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2019 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2019 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 21, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2016 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| May 30, 2015 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 15, 2012 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 13, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 30, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 7, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 14, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 4, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |