Drawing for AAA

USPTO serial 79011566

AAA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MURRAY, DAVID T
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AAA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Electric radiators for heating buildings; water purification units; water fountains; sterilized cupboard; ice chests; refrigerators; electric cookware, namely broilers, roasters; electric hot plates; bakers' ovens; pressure cooking saucepans, electric; coffee roasting ovens; electric bread cookers; electric coffee percolators; microwave ovens for cooking; electrical water heater; kettles, electric; deep fryers, electricSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 21, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 20, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 10, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 6, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 6, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 28, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 14, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 14, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 7, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 6, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 23, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 1, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 30, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 15, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance