Drawing for BUGABOO

USPTO serial 79011576

BUGABOO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BUGABOO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Furniture, mirrors, frames; goods (not included in other classes) of wood, cork, reed, cane, wicker, horn, bone, ivory, whalebone, shell, amber, mother-of-pearl, meerschaum and substitutes for all these materials, or made of plastics; chairs for babies (including high chairs), all afore-mentioned goods related to babies and childrenSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 19, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Sep 18, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 17, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 17, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 17, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 23, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 28, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 14, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 14, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 18, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 18, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 18, 2006ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 28, 2006LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2006LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 16, 2006NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 27, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 27, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 26, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 15, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance