USPTO serial 79011588
VMR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3291081Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 11, 2007
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VMR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert P. Michal,
ROBERT P MICHAL FRISHAUF, HOLTZ, GOODMAN & CHICK PC220 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10001-7708UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Agricultural machines and agricultural implements, namely silage spreaders, arable injectors, slurry injectors, spray boom spreaders, slurry applicators, vacuum sweepers, mowing machines, suction pumps, subsoilers, packers, mixers for animal food or agricultural products in combination with agricultural machines, pumps to be used in combination with agricultural machines | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | Land vehicles used in the agricultural sector, namely hay wagons, tankers and storage trucks; agricultural and industrial vehicles, namely silage wagons and trailers, forage wagons, transport tankers and slurry storage tanks | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Veenhuis Machines B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Veenhuis Machines B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Veenhuis Machines B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named VMR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2015 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 18, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 18, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 17, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 26, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 6, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 8, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 17, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 21, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 18, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |