Drawing for OPENSESAME!

USPTO serial 79011604

OPENSESAME!

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AMOS, TANYA L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OPENSESAME!?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Steel alloys, metal gates, safes, door bells (non-electric), metal locks (other than electric), metal knobs (handles), stretchers for metal bands (tension links), steel pipes, letter boxes (of metal), metal hardwareSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
009Electric locks, recorded computer operating programs, chronographs (apparatus for recording elapsed time), horn loudspeakers, presence monitoring apparatus, signal lanterns, aerials, transmitters (telecommunication), electric batteries, optical condensersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 5, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Sep 4, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 10, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 24, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 23, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 28, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 14, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 14, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 21, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 21, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 7, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 16, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 16, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 15, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 15, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance