USPTO serial 79011630
STEINEMANN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AGOSTO, GISELLE MARIE
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STEINEMANN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Fred W. Hathaway
FRED W HATHAWAY BUCHANAN INGERSOLL LLPPO BOX 1404ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines, namely sanding machines, grinding machines, varnishing machines, laminating machines, sanders and abrasive material | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Weighing instruments, namely, scales; measuring instruments, namely, tape measures; optical instruments, namely, optical inspection apparatus for industrial use; electrical and electronic controllers and automation systems comprising switches and electrical switch cabinets for industrial machines; data processing equipment, namely data processors; computer programs for the operation of machines and plants, electrical switch cabinets and electrical switches; scales; metering devices, namely dosing devise for the precise metering and transfer of liquids; control devices for machines and motors, namely electronic controls for motors | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | Paper based sanders, sanding materials | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | Rubber based sanders, sanding materials | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Education and training services, namely conducting seminars or workshop in the field of the installation, operation and maintenance of sanding machines, grinding machines, varnishing machines, laminating machines | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services and related research and design services, namely research and development of sanding and graphic devices; industrial analysis and research services, namely research and development of sanding and graphic devices, computer software and hardware design and development | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Steinemann Technology AG
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named STEINEMANN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Dec 9, 2012 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2006 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |