USPTO serial 79011720
PROJECT SHOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3228011Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 10, 2007
- Examiner
- RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROJECT SHOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Articles made of leather and imitations of leather, namely, all purpose athletic bags, all purpose sports bags, athletic bags, barrel bags, beach bags, book bags, carry-on bags, clutch bags, duffel bags, gym bags, overnight bags, school bags, shoulder bags, tote bags, travel bags, garment bags for travel, shoe bags for travel, attache cases, business card cases, business cases, calling card cases, document cases, key cases, overnight cases, cosmetic cases sold empty, toiletry cases sold empty, vanity cases sold empty, train cases, pocket wallets, purses, straps for luggage, luggage tags, luggage, trunks, haversacks, rucksacks, back-packs, satchels, pocket books, credit card cases, umbrellas | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Shirts, T-shirts, blouses, tank-tops, skirts, dresses, gowns, pants, trousers, shorts, Bermuda shorts, jeans, jackets, waistcoats, caps, hats, socks, stocking, tights, scarves, men's and ladies's underwear, swim wear, men's and women's footwear, belts, neckties | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PROJECTSHOP PTE LTD
- Other trademarks owned by PROJECTSHOP PTE LTD
- Other trademarks owned by PROJECTSHOP PTE LTD
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named PROJECT SHOP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 19, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 23, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 11, 2007 | IRRH | IRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 31, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 30, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 14, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | IRRF | IRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |