Drawing for DURMA

USPTO serial 79011765

DURMA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3114473Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 11, 2006
Examiner
SCHRODY, ALLISON PAIGE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DURMA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John S. Egbert

John S. Egbert Egbert Law Offices, PLLC1001 Texas Ave., Ste. 1250Houston, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machine tools for processing wood, metal, glass and synthetic materials, namely, wood drilling machines, continuous metal casting machines, metal fabricating machinery, namely, ironworkers, shears, punching machines, notching machines, bending machines, and press brakes; machine parts, namely, hydraulic and pneumatic cylinders in the nature of pistons, and caps thereforSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 17, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 11, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 2, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 2, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Oct 24, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 24, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jul 23, 2016PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71—
Jul 18, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 10, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 6, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Aug 17, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Aug 17, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Aug 15, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 9, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2010RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Apr 18, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 16, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 16, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 13, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 11, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 18, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 29, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 24, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 17, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 10, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 10, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 10, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 20, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 9, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 12, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 11, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 10, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 15, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2005SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance