Drawing for REFLEXAN

USPTO serial 79011768

REFLEXAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3220237Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 20, 2007
Examiner
BLANE, SUZANNE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REFLEXAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOSEPH H. McGLYNN

JOSEPH H MCGLYNN6111 SADDLE HORN DRFAIRFAX, VA 22030UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025footwearSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 1, 2023UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Dec 5, 2022DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 5, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 16, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2014GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 30, 2012DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 26, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 13, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 19, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 19, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 17, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 20, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 8, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 22, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 22, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 2, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 13, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 12, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 12, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 1, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 27, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 27, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 27, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2006PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2006APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Sep 18, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 18, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 19, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 12, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 22, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 20, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 19, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 28, 2005CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Sep 22, 2005CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 15, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2005SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance