USPTO serial 79011822
IR3535
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3256536Status 707Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 26, 2007
- Examiner
- ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with IR3535?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
64293 Darmstadt, DE
64293 Darmstadt, DE
DE
Darmstadt, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William C. Wright
William C. Wright EPSTEIN DRANGEL LLP60 EAST 42ND STREET, SUITE 2520NEW YORK, NY 10165UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Merck KGaA
- Other trademarks owned by Merck KGaA
- Other trademarks owned by SUSONITY Commercial GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Merck KGaA
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named IR3535
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2026 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2025 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 22, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 26, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 26, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2017 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 26, 2017 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 10, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 10, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 21, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 7, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 7, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 31, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |