Drawing for BEST PREMIUM

USPTO serial 79011960

BEST PREMIUM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JACKSON, STEVEN W
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEST PREMIUM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic drinks; fruit drinks and fruit juices; syrups and other preparations for making beveragesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 18, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 17, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 11, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 6, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 6, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 11, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 28, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 28, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 30, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 30, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 19, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 1, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2005RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Aug 3, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 2, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 29, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 28, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance