Drawing for ANNIL

USPTO serial 79012062

ANNIL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SCHRODY, ALLISON PAIGE
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ANNIL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Children's clothing, namely, jackets, shirts; knitwear, namely, knit pants, knit tops, sweaters; layettes; shoes; hats; hosiery; babies' pants; uniforms; underwear; pantsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 5, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 4, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 20, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 21, 2013CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 25, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 3, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 3, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 27, 2007MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 27, 2007ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 27, 2007OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Nov 24, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 8, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 7, 2006OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Nov 7, 2006OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Oct 17, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 27, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 23, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 11, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 3, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 27, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 25, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 25, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 11, 2006OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 24, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 10, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 10, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 26, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 10, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 5, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 4, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 31, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 5, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance