USPTO serial 79012126
KLEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3095888Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 23, 2006
- Examiner
- DWYER, SEAN
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KLEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical product for treating diseases of the respiratory tract, dietetic foods adapted for medical use, food supplements for medical use | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PIERRE FABRE SA
- Other trademarks owned by PIERRE FABRE SA
- Other trademarks owned by PIERRE FABRE MEDICAMENT
- Other trademarks owned by PIERRE FABRE MEDICAMENT
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named KLEM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2014 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2014 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 24, 2013 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 23, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 18, 2006 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 7, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 11, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |