Drawing for BEVERLY HILLS FORMULA NATURAL WHITE

USPTO serial 79012137

BEVERLY HILLS FORMULA NATURAL WHITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HELLMAN, ELI J
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEVERLY HILLS FORMULA NATURAL WHITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Toothpaste, mouth wash, dentifrices, cosmeticsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 5, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 4, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 15, 2014CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Apr 10, 2014CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 3, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 19, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 9, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 9, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 25, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 11, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 11, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 30, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 9, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 9, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 26, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 11, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 6, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 5, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 15, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance