Drawing for FULLFLEX

USPTO serial 79012183

FULLFLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3181118Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 5, 2006
Examiner
TANNER, MICHAEL R
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FULLFLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Arthur Schwartz

ARTHUR SCHWARTZ LAUBSCHER & LAUBSCHER PC1160 SPA RD STE 2BANNAPOLIS, MD 21403UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Shape memory alloys, namely, metal alloys comprised of compositions of nickel-titanium, nickel-titanium-iron and nickel-titanium-copper for further manufacturing; super-elastic alloys, namely, metal alloy comprised of compositions of nickel-titanium, nickel-titanium-iron, nickel-titanium-chromium and nickel-titanium-copper-chromium for further manufacturing; miscellaneous nonferrous metals and their alloys, namely, alloys containing nickel and titanium; [ metal springs not for use as parts in machines; ] wire of metal, metal tubes; [ metal gaskets, namely, gaskets formed of alloys containing nickel and titanium for use in the construction industry; mechanical seals of metal, namely, metal mechanical seals formed of alloys containing nickel and titanium excluding mechanical seals for machines ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 1, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 25, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 25, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
May 20, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 20, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 18, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 17, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 17, 2007COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Jul 17, 2007PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Jul 17, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 6, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 5, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 19, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 31, 2006LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 30, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 20, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 20, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 21, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 21, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 21, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 21, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 15, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 15, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2006RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 22, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 20, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 19, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 15, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance